Skip to content

Coaching and training

Management software for training and coaching organisations

Selling training means selling a seat in a session that does not exist yet, to a client who is not always the one paying, with proof to produce for each of them.

What your trade computes that others do not

The client and the payer are not the same person. An enrolment can be funded by the employer, by a training fund, by a public scheme or by the participant themselves — often by several at once. Each funder has its own file, approval delay, documents and payment calendar. A generic CRM models one client per deal; here you need two, sometimes three, or the payment chase goes to the wrong party.

The session, not the contract, is the unit of management. A session has a date, a venue, a trainer, a number of seats and a threshold below which it does not run. Signed revenue is therefore not delivered revenue: it converts as sessions run, slip or get cancelled, and that gap is what decides the quarter's cash.

Finally, paying the people who sell follows rules of its own. Commission on the sale or on cash collected, a rate that varies by product or by tier reached, clawback on cancellation, splits when two people worked the deal: most organisations compute this in a monthly spreadsheet nobody else can rebuild, and which the sales team disputes because they cannot check it themselves.

What most organisations work around by hand

Each of these costs a few hours a month and a slice of internal trust.

  • Commission is recomputed by hand every month, and argued over every month.
  • Funding files are tracked in a shared mailbox.
  • A session's fill rate is read by counting rows in a spreadsheet.
  • Attendance sheets and certificates are produced one by one after each session.
  • Payment chasers go to the participant when it is the employer who owes.
  • Nobody can say what a salesperson actually generated over twelve months.

Frequently asked questions

Can commission be computed automatically?
Yes, and it is the most common starting point because it wastes time and trust at once. The rule is written once — base, rate, tiers, clawback on cancellation, splits between two sellers — then applied on its own. Salespeople watch their own line being built, which ends the monthly argument far more reliably than a better spreadsheet.
Can one enrolment have several funders?
It is a baseline requirement of the trade, and the point where most generic CRMs give up. An enrolment carries a split across funders, each with its file status, documents and due date; chasing and invoicing follow that split instead of defaulting to the enrolled person.
Can the tool help with quality requirements?
It can carry the record: invitations sent, attendance, evaluations, complaints, documents issued, each with a date. That is most of what an audit asks for and most of what goes missing when everything lives in shared folders. It certifies nothing on your behalf and does not replace your framework: it makes the evidence exist at the moment it is requested.
Do we have to replace our e-learning platform?
No. A learning platform and a management tool answer different questions: one hosts content and learning paths, the other tracks the sale, the funding and delivery. The two connect on enrolments and progress, which removes double entry without forcing a rebuild.

Let’s talk about your project

Describe what you are trying to build. We answer with an honest first read on feasibility and scope — even when the answer is that you do not need us.

Tell us about your trade